Category: Writers Block
QUESTION: If ANYTHING is to either be HAD AND/OR DONE, and that if INSTANT GRATIFICATION was the ONLY OPTIONAL MEANS AVAILABLE, by which to HAVE AND/OR DO WHATEVER, and that SUCH OPTION carried ABSOLUTELY NO NEGATIVE REPROCUSSIONS, WHATSOEVER, against EITHER SIDE, according to NO ONE, or the OTHER'S TERMS, WHATSOEVER, SHOULD THE OPTION BE ACTED UPON, should or shouldn't there STILL be any caution given to warn against making that choice, ANYWAY? IF SO, EITHER WAY, why?
...what the fuck?
Your topicks are strange. I can't understand them. But it is the only time that i don't blaim my bad English for that because not English speaking people can understand them either lol.
Whatever you say, I'd do it, just to see what happened. <lol>
I agree with Nikos. Maybe I don't speak english after all.
Bob
how many commas is that anyways? 9 or 10? something like that...
Lololololol BabyGurlJ!
Ok this is scary cause i think I understand what is being asked. lol. Ok are you asking if masturbation or sex by any other means is ok if both units are in agreement? If that is close to the question then I think anything is ok sexually as long both are in agreement.
Choices? I d rather have delayed gratification because at least you learn from what you've accomplished and you will value and appreciate those things or whatever achievements you get whereas if you look at getting what you want at an instant, then there is no challenge. Yes, you will feel great for quite awhile, but you will not understand the true meaning of sacrifice and hard work. I think, it's better to work diligently for what you want, instead of recieving. Look at our society now, they want things handed to them quick, easy, and cheap. Why do you think so many people like McDonalds or those strip clubs, or things that are easy to do? Well, because they want it now.
Ok, Prettygurl0287--GREAT FEEDBACK--I wanna THOROUGHLY CONGRADULATE YOU for making COMPLETE, PERFECT EXAMPLES of the VERY BRILLIANCE TO BE DESIRED, but NEVER OBTAINABLE, of those that've messaged in this discussion, prior to yours. There just MIGHT be MORE CANDIDATES OF SUCH EXAMPLES-TO-BE-MADE, unless THESE, that are ALREADY-MADE, might be made FURTHER.
To further explain the whole question, I will try to put it in simple words in roder for people to get what his trying to say, so here goes. If you were given a chance would you rather go for something easily without working hard for it, or would you rather go through a great deal of work just to get there. Now, this question not only apply to the choices we make and the work we do in our daily lives, this question also apply to everything as well such as: our morals and values, our way of living, how we deal with other people, and as a whole our society and culture itself. Now, if you have other examples or disagreements to put in here feel free to do so.
CLOSE, Prettygurl, BUT NOT EXACTLY--I understand that this CAN be QUITE A CHALLENGE to grasp, but WHENEVER you get the opportunity, try to dissect, SECTION BY SECTION, and with EACH PART that's sectioned, try to grasp what each would INDIVIDUALLY mean, and once ALL are accounted for, THERE would be the WHOLE PICTURE. In FACT, I'll GLADLY help you do that: take the VERY BEGINNING LINE: "If ANYTHING is to either be HAD AND/OR DONE" is self-explanatory, because "ANYTHING" is unspecified, which avails YOU the VERY OPPORTUNITY to IMPROVIZE, IMAGINATIVELY, if you will, allowing your imagination to be as FAR-FETCHED, if such be the case, as it would take you to count to the HIGHEST NUMBER IN THE UNIVERSE, IN ANY SPOKEN LANGUAGE of YOUR CHOICE, if not ALL, ONE AT A TIME.
The NEXT section: "and that if INSTANT GRATIFICATION was the ONLY OPTIONAL MEANS AVAILABLE, by which to HAVE AND/OR DO WHATEVER," has a DRAMATIC impact, because "INSTANT ""ANYTHING"" IS INDEED, ABSOLUTELY RISKY--make NO MISTAKE about THAT.
"And that SUCH OPTION carried ABSOLUTELY NO NEGATIVE REPROCUSSIONS, WHATSOEVER, against EITHER SIDE, according to NO ONE, or the OTHER'S TERMS, SHOULD THE OPTION BE ACTED UPON," as the VERY NEXT SECTION, challenges ANY, if not EVERY (pardon the term), "DEVIL'S ADVOCATE," who DARINGLY challenges the IMMEDIATE-PREVIOUS SECTION, rendering one TOTALLY AMUNITIONLESS AND TRAPPED, whose ONLY RESPONSE, VOLUNTARY OR NOT, would be that of TOTAL SURRENDER to the conqueror.
Now, THIS, as well as the VERY NEXT AND FINAL SECTION to this picture, is the BEYOND-ALL-EXTREMES-TWO-PART-PROVOKATION, guaranteed to UNINHIBITTEDLY MOCK the already-conquered's either PERHAPS-INDEFINITE-OR-PERMINENT inability to EVER RECOVER, by asking the following questions that FLY, DEFIANTLY, in the VERY FACE of ANY REPROCUSSION. For THIS section, the "PART 1 QUESTION," for lack of any better-or-best term, is limited to accomodate THESE TWO CHOICE ANSWERS, AND THESE, ONLY, which are either "YES" or "NO": "should or shouldn't there STILL be any caution given to warn against making that choice, ANYWAY?" After ALL, how else COULD you answer, INSTEAD of either/or?
The "PART 2 QUESTION" completes this ENTIRE PICTURE: "IF SO, EITHER
WAY, why?" THIS is the VERY SPARK that could VERY WELL SPARK the VERY FLAME OF ALL CONSEQUENTIALLY-PROCEEDING FLAMES of a PROBABLE-OR-POSSIBLE MULTI-ALARM FIRE of ABSOLUTELY-ENDLESS CHALLENGES, as well as COUNTER-CHALLENGES, as the VERY RESULT.